Hi,
today I played another one session of TI SE and during our game we faced this problem. One of my friends played as Naalu. This rase has well known ability to retreat before the battle (which is really pain in ... ;-)). I had 'Flanking Tactic' AC, which disable the Naalu ability. But Naalu ally played 'Sabotage' and canceled my card.
Flanking Tactic says 'regardless of Special Abilities or Action Cards that would allow a retreat'. So cancelling my 'Flanking' card by 'Sabotage' allows them to retreat, but not directly.
What is the correct answer, should this be possible?
Is also sacrificing an Agent to sabotage my 'Flanking Tactic' a valid move?
If yes, is there a good way to prevent Naalu from retreating constantly?
I maybe can somehow corner them or surround them, maybe they will run out of Strategic Counters, but so will I run out of Command Counters...
Thanks in advance for any help and Best Regards,
(sorry, my english may not be fluent and correct :-))
Kamil Wilczek
today I played another one session of TI SE and during our game we faced this problem. One of my friends played as Naalu. This rase has well known ability to retreat before the battle (which is really pain in ... ;-)). I had 'Flanking Tactic' AC, which disable the Naalu ability. But Naalu ally played 'Sabotage' and canceled my card.
Flanking Tactic says 'regardless of Special Abilities or Action Cards that would allow a retreat'. So cancelling my 'Flanking' card by 'Sabotage' allows them to retreat, but not directly.
What is the correct answer, should this be possible?
Is also sacrificing an Agent to sabotage my 'Flanking Tactic' a valid move?
If yes, is there a good way to prevent Naalu from retreating constantly?
I maybe can somehow corner them or surround them, maybe they will run out of Strategic Counters, but so will I run out of Command Counters...
Thanks in advance for any help and Best Regards,
(sorry, my english may not be fluent and correct :-))
Kamil Wilczek