by aledrugo1977
humeniuc wrote:
In my opinion this comment wants to be an review. An comparation, an challenge between three contestants. These was the words of the author. He wanted to compare them. To say which one is better. What are the strenghts and weakness of every contestants.
That changes the rules. This means objectivity. This means to pass over the personal tastes, and see the goods and the bads of every cadidates.
......
In my opinion that target of objectivity was not acomplished....
Well, I think, as someone already told you, "Everyone is biased".
I mean a review, a suggestion, a comparison, whatever it's obviously merely an opinion. This review/comparison it's my humble experience about TI3, Eclipse and EPC.
It is not the Truth, it's only MY truth. Of course I respect the opinions of the others.
For me TI3 it's the best choise for a Space Opera...honestly speaking for me the duration of TI3 ISN'T a problem 'cause I like it. Anyway I gave "only" 2 starts because I know it isn't suitable for all the players.
Why this example?
Because I honestly wrote this review, it's simply what I think and what I believe should be useful the the readers.
I like TI3, it's good to say "hey I love you" even to a boardgame.
It is called "endorsement": you know what you are reading.
Don't you like TI3? Well immediatly you know my point of view.
I think the best way to talk about boardgames (and not only) it's to be square and clean: I want you to know who I am, where I came from and where I'm going.
TI3, Eclipse and EPC are good boardgames, no doubt.
TI3 and EPC are, for my taste, more "complete" as Space Opera.